Theory of knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

Theory of fellowship - seek ExampleThe source of valet knowledge pee-pee been attempted to be apologizeed by philosophers. Due to this, on that point are two ways that kick in been used to explain the source of human knowledge in that on one stead, freethinking explains that human knowledge is based on rationality or reasonableness while on the other hand, sensationalism states that human knowledge is based on experience or posteriori knowledge Many people have argued that human knowledge originate from experience but It is more(prenominal) sensible to argue that neither side can be neglected instead what need to be done is that both schools of thought that explain the source of human knowledge should be combined so that it makes more sense. Hence this can be classified as justified true belief. Knowledge is fundamentally a belief or convection that soulfulness has in something or a thing. However, knowledge can be enhanced by a combine of reason and experience. Plato Pl ato argued that in order to demarcate the difference amid knowledge and opinion must be reasonably or rationally justified. It is from this view that Plato stresses that knowledge is innate. This is because from his dialogues with Socrates, Plato presents the erudition that soul existed before birth with the structure of perfect knowledge and good of everything. Therefore, when something is learned, it can be recalled. concord to his argument, he made clear promissory note between knowledge and mere opinion which he express is not certain. In order for human mind to make a belief that is dependable or reliable, there has to be substantive evidence on it. This, therefore, leads to justification of our beliefs. Justification is established by the distinction between believing that something is true and between cunning that something is what it is (Sosa...Therefore, it is important to make distinction between knowing that, how and acquaintance knowledge. Traditionally, there exis ted two methods to theory of knowledge. Empiricism which stresses that we get our knowledge via sensory experiences while rationalism on the other hand which claims that people gain their knowledge through reasoning.The source of human knowledge have been attempted to be explained by philosophers. Due to this, there are two ways that have been used to explain the source of human knowledge in that on one side, rationalism explains that human knowledge is based on rationality or reason while on the other hand, empiricism states that human knowledge is based on experience or posteriori knowledge Many people have argued that human knowledge originate from experience but It is more sensible to argue that neither side can be neglected instead what need to be done is that both schools of thought that explain the source of human knowledge should be combined so that it makes more sense. Hence this can be classified as justified true belief. Knowledge is basically a belief or convection that someone has in something or a thing. However, knowledge can be enhanced by a combination of reason and experience. Plato argued that in order to demarcate the difference between knowledge and opinion must be reasonably or rationally justified. Truth is the capability of the information acquired being consistent with evident presented and truths close it.